WALE WATCHING
Readers continue to battle about coupling horses owned/trained by the same person, it is an interesting argument with many good points made by both sides of the fence.
We will change up the POLL this week to address Sunday's PRINCE OF WALES STAKES at Fort Erie. The track will host the 2nd leg of the Triple Crown once again and no doubt put on a super show of stakes events and racing.
Can MIKE FOX win again? Submit your vote.
BIG WEEKEND FOR KINGHAVEN FARMS
David Willmot’s Kinghaven Farms had a litany of winners not only carrying the blue and white silks of the farm but homebreds racing for other interests.
QUIET ACTION, owned by Woodford Racing, won the Ontario Damsel Stakes yesterday with a perfect trip over good turf and the 3yo grey miss by Forest Wildcat took the $125,000 quite handily. She was bred by Kinghaven and is a daughter of the mare Whispering Wishes.
Kinghaven-bred JUST IN CASE JIMMY won his first race in 3 years (since the Elgin Stakes in 2004) yesterday when he won for $40,000 claiming and just about knocked off stablemate Palladio’s track record of 1:43 for 1 1/16 miles. Jimmy, by Whiskey Wisdom out of Alycheer, was racing over a lightning fast Polytrack (made that way because of the heavy rain earlier in the day) so his Beyer Figure was just 84.
And Kinghaven owned and bred PROPHETICALLY (Pulpit-Torrid Affair) won her maiden Saturday with a smart 89 Beyer Figure in a maiden allowance race and LYRICALLY (Thunder Gulch-Lover’s Talk) won an allowance race yesterday with just a 76 Beyer Figure. That pair of fillies are trained by IAN BLACK.
Saturday’s CLARENDON STAKES went to Hill ‘n’ Dale Farms-bred DONERAILE GEM (Doneraile Court – Genuine Emerald) who stayed undefeated in 2 starts with the handy win in the 5 ½ furlong race for owner/trainer John Cardella.
The colt’s Beyer Figure was only a 60.
Champion CATCH THE THRILL trailed all the way in her return from a long layoff on Saturday. Racing on the grass at 1 1/8 miles, the top 2yo filly of last year was more than 18 lengths behind the second-to-last horse.
PRINCE OF
Just 5 horses for Sunday’s PRINCE OF WALES STAKES at
Daryl Wells Jr. offers up the latest news…
Plate winner Mike Fox, with jockey Emma-Jayne Wilson aboard, breezed five furlongs in 1:00 3/5. The handsome son of
“I was very happy with the work,” said trainer Ian Black. “It was (an ) even work, he galloped out strong, just like he did before the Plate.”
Plate runner-up Alezzandro also worked five furlongs. The son of High Yeild covered the distance in a snappy 59 1/5. He galloped out six furlongs in 1:13 flat.
“The work was good and I was quite happy with the way he handled himself,” said Kevin Attard, who trains Alezzaandro.
Marchfield completed the
“It was just what we wanted,” said trainer Mark Casse. “On the way to
At
“He went very well,” said trainer Arthur Magnuson. “The horse is fine, he couldn’t be doing any better.”
Magnuson has taken over the training duties from Kiaran McLaughlin, who is serving a seven-day suspension. Magnuson report that Mike Luzzi has been named to ride Daaher on Sunday.
MARYFIELD 4TH
Canadian-bred MARYFIELD earned a 94 Beyer Figure when a close 4th, beaten 1 ¼ lengths in the Grade 1 Princess Rooney Stakes at Calder on Saturday, the Summit of Speed day. The Elusive Quality mare has won 7 of 26 starts and over $576,000. She is a Grade 2 stakes winner bred by Mike Carroll and John Harvey in
3 Comments:
At 4:28 PM, Anonymous said…
That filly Prophetically....she isn't she gorgeous... and that pedigree...one to watch I think.
At 8:06 PM, Anonymous said…
Thanks to Cangamble and Anon 10:22 for your replies. One more final response from me and we’ll call it quits. Seems both of you have no problem with horses, trained by the same trainer but uncoupled for betting. For some reason you are discounting the fact that such scenarios can be and have been manipulated by the trainer very very easily. As an actual example of manipulation, I can only draw your attention to the harness racing scene a few years ago. One certain trainer, one of the elites on the WO scene, one with a huge UTRS and a large stable, was entering 2 horses into a race as frequently as he could. In about 80% of such races, his longer priced horse would win, while the other, which inevitably was the favourite, ran out. The situation got so out of hand that, finally, WO refused to accept multiple entries from him. The story going around was that a few “heavy” bettors were ready to terminate their action on WO races unless management “solved” this problem, and refusing entries was WO’s solution. This then, is the inevitable result of a flawed policy regarding uncoupled entries, and it is only a matter of time before the same kind of scenario happens with thoroughbreds. Why go down this road, protect the bettors now. ORC are you listening!
Cangamble you make a god point regarding warm-ups for sore horses. In fact there are 1 or 2 key jockeys that I will never bet, if they give their horse a decent warm-up. Why? Because these very astute jockeys know they are sitting on a sore animal that has no hope whatsoever of winning today. Many of these horses, are (to quote Joe Takach) quick “pull-ups”. This kind of info can save a ton of money.
Cangamble, I hear you when you question my comment about an unexpected pace challenge. True “Falcon Lake” has a up close running style but my pace numbers indicated he could not keep up, hence my comment. The horse surprised me, and that happens.
By the way, Cangamble, I do enjoy your web-site blog, and fully agree with your thoughts on take-out. With the slots revenue flowing in WO has had a remarkable opportunity to actually reduce take-out, but it didn’t. Looks like it will never happen.
At 9:15 AM, Anonymous said…
Anon, if WEG doesn't change their stance on ridiculously high takeouts (the same with the whole industry), Willmot or whoever takes over his job will continue to whine like a baby about offshore rebate houses and Betfair. The reality is that their bottom line will continue to stagnate when it comes to horse racing revenues. Think about it, horse race betting is now available at home, yet the total monies bet can't even keep up with inflation. The race track owners are stuck in a 1935 mentality.
As far as coupled betting is concerned. The higher the purses, the less there is a chance for corruption. But you have to remember that many jockeys are best friends with each other, and trainers are sometimes related to each other. I remember in the early 80's, there seemed to be 2 or three Attard brother trained horses in every race, and you can't couple brother's entries either.
The way owners switch trainers these days, I don't think too many trainers can chance fooling around like that in the thoroughbred game (because horses only race around 6-15 times a year on average). It is different in the harness game, because harness horses are hardier and can run two or three times every three weeks. And the purses are less.
I just linked a story about the Faulkner's who separately trained the first four finishers in superfecta race at Thistledown last week.
Low purses and lots of Faulkner's can easily mean potential for a lot of corruption. But hopefully it doesn't happen.
Post a Comment