ascot aug08
This is a single article. Click HERE to go to the main page.

Thursday, August 02, 2007

MIKE AND ALEX SHOW?

The draw for the BREEDERS' STAKES the 3rd jewel of Canada's Triple crown is today - not a lot of attention is paid because there is not a horse going for the sweep this year.
ALEZZANDRO sure came close though, missing the Plate by 1/2 a length to MIKE FOX and then romping in the PRINCE OF WALES.

Good discussions going on currently - a story posted yesterday talked about why horse racing events are on TV at all.........an interesting debate.

UPDATE...3 P.M. - BREEDERS' POSTS
Field for the 117th running of the Breeders' Stakes
To be run Sunday, August 5, 2007

Three-Year-Olds, Foaled In Canada
One Mile and One-Half
E.P. Taylor Turf Course
Woodbine Racetrack
All to carry 126 lbs.

PP/Horse/Owner/Trainer/Jockey/M-L odds

1/It's a Danzig/Stan Fulton/Rebecca Maker/Jesse Campbell/10-1

2/Mike Fox/D. Morgan Firestone/Ian Black/Emma-Jayne Wilson/7-2

3/Ice Bear/Augustin Farms/Mac Benson/David Clark/8-1

4/Twilight Meteor/Peachtree Stable/Todd Pletcher/Chris DeCarlo/6-1

5/Walk with Kings/Sam-Son Farm/Mark Frostad/Garry Cruise/12-1

6/It's Like This/Christina Takter, John Fielding & David Anderson/Mike
Doyle/Tyler Pizarro/30-1

7/Storm the Castle/Sam-Son Farm/Mark Frostad/Slade Callaghan/20-1

8/Alezzandro/Knob Hill Stable and the Estate of Steve Stavro/Kevin
Attard/Todd Kabel/3-1

9/Top Speed/Shyman Farms/Wayne Mogge/Robert Landry/20-1

10/Marchfield/Melnyk Racing Stables Inc./Mark Casse/Patrick
Husbands/9-2

Probable favourites: Alezzandro * Mike Fox - Marchfield

Total Purse/$500,000
Winner to receive/$300,000
2nd/$100,000
3rd/$55,000
4th/$30,000
5th/$15,000

Post-time: 5:08 p.m. ET
TV: The Score 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. ET

Note - GOLANI WAS A LATE SCRATCH DUE TO LAMENESS.

WOODBINE WEDNESDAY

Meanwhile it was an entertaining and very informative show on THE SCORE last night and that keeps that program easily the tops of any program that Woodbine does during the week.

The important aspects of the show are good features, excellent interviews that yield useful information and (okay,the “great” giggling love-fest gets to be much at times) - well, the program is excellent for those who want to bet.

(but why did those good interviews suddenly stop for the last races?)


EMMA-JAYNE WILSON won the Daily Double – the first on ARTIE HOT, who was dropping out of stakes races for the $44,500 allowance on Polytrack for Tucci Stables and trainer Nick Gonzalez.

While Artie was very predictable, Wilson shook up NORTHERN CITY for Jim and Susan Hill and trainer Barry Lerman and won the 2nd in her 2nd career start and first since she debuted at Keeneland in April. The New York bred is by City Zip.

RACE 3 – A shrewd ride by Justin Stein got GURKHAS BAND home in front in the 6 ½ furlong, $50,000 claiming race (he was offered for $47,500) after setting a soft pace early and holding off the classy old timer Sir Blitz.

Considering the BAND ran so well after going 21 4/5 and 44 3/5 in his last start on turf in a sprint, this was a dream ride for the Florida-bred for Laurie Silvera, owner and trainer.

A classy guy who ran well last year for $62,500, Gurkhas Band ran in 1:15 4/5 and paid a lovely $21.50 for those who selected him.

“I was surprised,” said Stein, about getting away with 23 1/5 and 46 2/5. “I saw the fractions I couldn’t believe how soft they were and I had tons of horse for the stretch run.”

“I had him on stall race for a month before his first race, he was not traveling right,” said Silvera. “I couldn’t find anything wrong with him.”

Refreshing moment:

Trainer JOHN DIMARCO spoke of Flashy N Classy BEFORE race 4, a maiden allowance for Ontario sired older fellows:

When asked by Sandy Hawley – ‘did you do anything different with this horse for tonight?’, DiMarco said:

“The horse has a habit of wanting to bite other horses in a race and looking sideways so we put a sliding bit on him, closed up the blinkers so Patrick has more control over him.”

Also, first-timer CLEVER ATTORNEY flipped in the paddock, according to THE SCORE show, but was deemed okay to race by vets.

Well, Flashy N Classy ran well, he chased front running Dad’s Fishing early in the 6 furlong race, bid to the lead off the turn but then was passed late by VEGAS ANGEL, a grey Ontario-bred gelding by Tethra-Corey’s Angel, by With Approval, bred by John Carey and Tucci Stables.

Winning owners – Ninela Tbreds, C. LoGrasso and A. Hrynisak, trainer – Abraham Katryan.

“He’s a nice little horse, my exercise rider suggested an equipment change,” said Katryan.

Vegas Angel debuted on the grass and had good speed, earned a 70 Beyer. He bounced in his Polytrack debut in what figures to be an ultra-key race won by Beenthruthedesert.

Race 5 – ANTHONY STEPHEN, who arrived a couple of months ago from hastings Park (and India, Hong King and Macau) to ride at Woodbine, got his first local score with a very nice riding job on BUENISIMA, a 31 to 1 long bomb who stalked the pace covered-up on the rail most of the way before tipping out 3 wide and rallying to catch Juli’s Dancer, who ran rank on the pace all the way.

It was the first win of the year for trainer Eric Garcea. Buenisima had blinkers off and EAR MUFFS on. It was her first top three finish since a win last May 11 at the allowance level; The filly had only one other attempt at the $10,000 claiming level that she won at last night and it was a 5th place finish, beaten 2 ¾ lengths (1 ¾ to Juli’s Dancer) with a 56 Beyer Figure.

Race 6- FAITH TO THE END, well named, as she was clear on the turn in that “B’ level maiden allowance, passed by Stronach Stables’ SILK CANDY in mid-stretch but then battled back to win by a long nose for KK Sangara and trainer Lorne Richards. She is by Buddha and a Florida bred.

JIMMY JIMMY, I mean, JUST IN CASE JIMMY, a fan favourite, came from impossibly far back and seemingly had no chance to catch up but somehow did, nailing HIGH VOLT JOLT on the wire in race 7, a $50,000 claimer. Jimmy stole the race from the Jolt, who was moved early, on the turn, cleared but couldn’t hold on. It was the 5th win in Jimmy’s 30th start for Bill Werner and Roger Attfield.

In that race THAT’S AN OUTRAGE was eased in his 2nd race since being claimed by Tucci Stables for $60,000.

And HONEY TREAT simply galloped in the finale for maiden $20,000 fillies. The Kentucky bred by Wild Rush was in the pace duel and then took off for Don Amos and Clover IV Racing and trainer Danny Vella.

 
BREEDERS’ STAKES NO. 117
Lots of cool twists to the BREEDERS' this year  - despite no Triple Crown winner.
Can MIKE FOX redeem himself from that drab outing in the Prince of Wales?
Will ALEZZANDRO romp in his grass debut, thereby missing the Triple Crown
sweep by 1/2 a length?
Does the EUGENE MELYNK, MARK CASSE, PAT HUSBANDS train roll on
(Sealy Hill, Gouldings Green etc.) with MARCHFIELD?
Does George Strawbridge get a Canadian classic win with his supplemented
ICE BEAR?
Does owner STUART HYMAN get his first win as an owner AT WOODBINE with
TOP SPEED or the maiden GOLANI?
and just how fast is STORM THE CASTLE going to go early in the race as his role of
rabbit for SAM-SON FARMS? Or will he go fast at all?


(FROM WOODBINE MEDIA OFFICE) - NOTE - SEE UPDATE ABOVE
Probable Field for the 117th running of the Breeders' Stakes
To be run Sunday, August 5, 2007
 Three-Year-Olds, Foaled In Canada
One Mile and One-Half 
E.P. Taylor Turf Course
Woodbine Racetrack
All to carry 126 lbs.
 
Horse/Owner/Trainer/Jockey
Alezzandro/Knob Hill Stable and the Estate of Steve Stavro/Kevin
Attard/Todd Kabel
Golani/Shyman Farms/Mike Keogh/Emile Ramsammy
Ice Bear/Augustin Farms/Mac Benson/David Clark
It's a Danzig/Stan Fulton/Rebecca Maker/Jesse Campbell
It's Like This/Christina Takter, John Fielding & David Anderson/Mike
Doyle/Tyler Pizarro
Marchfield/Melnyk Racing Stables Inc./Mark Casse/Patrick Husbands
Mike Fox/D. Morgan Firestone/Ian Black/Emma-Jayne Wilson
Storm the Castle/Sam-Son Farm/Mark Frostad/Garry Cruise
Top Speed/Shyman Farms/Wayne Mogge/Robert Landry
Twilight Meteor/Peachtree Stable/Todd Pletcher/Chris DeCarlo
Walk with Kings/Sam-Son Farm/Mark Frostad/Slade Callaghan
 
Total Purse/$500,000
Winner to receive/$300,000     
2nd/$100,000   
3rd/$55,000
4th/$30,000
5th/$15,000
 
Post-time:  5:08 p.m. ET 
TV:  The Score 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. ET
 
 
POW hero Alezzandro set for Breeders'
 
TORONTO, August 1 - Prince of Wales Stakes hero Alezzandro returns to
action in Sunday's $500,000 Breeders' Stakes at Woodbine. 
 
Owned by Knob Hill Stable and the Estate of Steve Stavro, the
fast-improving Kevin Attard trainee seeks to become the first
three-year-old since A Bit O'Gold in 2004 to win the final two jewels
 of
the Canadian Triple Crown of Racing.
 
Like A Bit O'Gold, Alezzandro won the Prince of Wales after finishing a
narrow runner-up in the 1 1/4-mile Queen's Plate. 
 
Reigning Sovereign Award winning jockey Todd Kabel guided Alezzandro to
the front and never looked back during his 1 3/16-mile tour of the Fort
Erie main track, his first race over a conventional dirt surface. 
 
On Sunday, the son of High Yield will face another new challenge - a
maiden voyage over the world-renowned E.P. Taylor Turf Course.
 
The surface switch doesn't deter Attard, who watched the dark bay work
six furlongs over the 1 1/2-mile course in 1:16 3/5, breezing, with the
'dogs' up. The move was Alezzandro's first career turf breeze.
 
"As a two-year-old, we had him on the turf at Payson (Park, Florida),
but nothing serious. I don't think turf should be an issue," said
Attard. "He worked well. He seems to have the same kind of stride on
dirt and Polytrack as he does on turf."
 
While working over the course gave Alezzandro a feel for the terrain
beneath him, Attard said it was also designed to give him an idea what
he would see as he progresses around the oval, which is located outside
the Polytrack.
 
"We were trying to get him on the turf and acquainted with that course.
A lot of horses gawk at the stands because they're so much closer to
 the
grandstand than they are accustomed," explained the 31-year-old.
 
As a lightly-raced sophomore with just four starts under him,
Alezzandro certainly has the right to exhibit the behavior of others in
his breed. It's unlikely, considering how he's handled all his lessons
while being fast-tracked to stardom.  
 
"He's had a tight schedule," said Attard. "He's progressed each time
he's run. Hopefully, the streak continues and he keeps taking those
steps forward and we haven't seen the best of him yet."
 
At face value, Alezzandro's ability to control the pace early and stay
on bravely appears to have played a significant part in his rise to the
top of the division. In each of his three route efforts, he's led for
 at
least the opening eight furlongs.
 
According to Attard, Alezzandro's early approach is not a prerequisite
element in his recipe for success. 
 
"I think he's kind of inherited the lead because nobody has really
wanted it. I don't think he's a need-the-lead type of horse," offered
Attard. "When he broke his maiden he wasn't on the lead. He sat off and
made his move."
 
Outside the Knob Hill camp, there may be more doubt surrounding
Alezzandro's tactical arsenal, which is fine with Attard.
 
"I read that (trainer Mark) Frostad is sending a horse in there to be a
rabbit for mine. If somebody wants the lead on Sunday, it's all
 theirs,"
declared Attard.
 
The plot thickens -- only on Sunday, after a 1,440-foot stretch run,
will the climax present itself.  If one thing is certain, it's that the
presence of Alezzandro's sheer talent has the potential to make the
117th edition of the Breeders' Stakes a great event.
 -end-

9 Comments:

  • At 9:08 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    The Weds night SCORE broacast have been pretty good this year but I have to agree the Love-in does get a litte annoying. Sometimes, less is more when you are trying to be funny and/or witty.

    Woodbine's production team seems to have come along way. I still think there are better ways for them to try to get casual fans to watch but overall it is pretty entertaining. I like that they have been willing to try new things. "Rapid Fire" is 1000 times more entertaining than "Jockey Jeopardy"

    good on them.

     
  • At 9:42 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    How nice was it to hear last night from Constant Montpellier that he made a mistake! (In regards to his ride with Sir Blitz) Mr. Montpellier you have just moved up several notches in my books.

    As for the Score show, the guys do a great job. Keep it up. 3 hours of horse racing on a Wednesday night. Does it get any better than that?

    Tom

     
  • At 12:46 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Yes it does get better, I think!

    Why do so few people "get" that this is about betting. Why not put the money allocated to producing the Wednesday shows into improving the daily in-house show? Stop dreaming that network television (The Score?) is going to "attract new fans". Worry about the ones you have. Yes, the model worked for poker, but horse racing, especially thoroughbred, isn't as simple as playing two cards. Variables like different distances, different surfaces, trainer changes, classes, everything is much too intimidating to the novice. For most, it is worse than algebra! It takes years of study and exposure in order to truly absorb it all and enjoy it, and most of us still have moments where even we're not sure!

    So...when it comes to horse racing, I say design a product that appeals to those already interested. They are the meat and potatoes of the industry. Besides, not many new fans would watch the Wednesday night show with the idiotic, childish behaviour that it's hosts partake in. Lots of the time it reminds me of watching the Naked Gun series of movies! You keep waiting for Leslie Nielsen to appear. What are they, in kindergarten? Nice professionalism. All of them are better than that.

     
  • At 1:58 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Anon 12:46 -

    If the daily in-house show was "improved" and the Wednesday night Score show was lost, how would that improve betting as you say "so few people don't "get" that this is about betting"?

    Most serious bettors at the racetrack don't want to hear anything from commentators on screen as they all seem to have their own methods for wagering. So how would improving this show increase wagering? And are you then saying that the people already AT the racetrack would then bet MORE if there was a better show on-track - I highly highly doubt that!

    Limiting this sport to the racetracks and a subscription only channel would be rediculous! What's that phrase - out of sight out of mind?

    If you look at any jurisdiction in North American racing right now the focus is on getting this sport out to the masses as much as possible. If it doesn't get to the massess and is left to the core audience that already exists, how is anyone else ever going to come to the racetrack once the current group dies off?

    It is definitely a tough sport to absorb but a viewer seeing an educated but light-hearted look at races on a main network channel gives the novice a chance to make that decision as to whether or not it is too intimidating. If it wasn't there - there would never be that chance.

    I'm a long time gambler/horse lover and when I can't make it to the track I personally like watching this show because it gives me a bit of a "breather" from the old/crotchety-looking/no personality analysts that are seen at most racetracks.
    If you watch any network sports show nowadays, the focus is keeping it lighthearted otherwise it's too boring to watch. TSN's Sportscentre, Sportsnet's Connected, The Score's show all use commentators that joke and play the light-hearted side of sports.

    For those that don't want to hear the jovial attitude of some of the commentators - turn off the volume and watch the pictures - but don't suggest turning off the sport completely to the masses, that's a little rediculous.

     
  • At 2:24 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I appreciate your opinion, the only problem is it is wrong!

    You are expressing YOUR views, not those of the masses. YES, people do listen to the commentators. Perhaps you didn't read the days worth of banter about Dan Loiselle. Other such commentators also get a lot of press on this and other such forums. So to say, "most serious bettors at the racetrack don't want to hear anything from commentators on screen," is in itself "rediculous", which I'm guessing is your version of the spelling of the word ridiculous.

    You probably don't even realize it, but you brought legitimacy to one of my very points with a statement of your own. When you said that, "I'm a long time gambler/horse lover and when I can't make it to the track I personally like watching this show,", you confirmed for all my point that a lot of the viewership of the Wednesday show consists of horsepeople and chronic fans. Instead of a third outlet (with the track itself and TRN being the others), why not invest that money into improving the two initial, most popular conduits?

    And as far as the "jovial attitude of some of the commentators"...there is a difference between being jovial and silly. Based on your post, I'm certain that you know the difference.

    Thanks for trying, though.

     
  • At 3:05 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Anon 10:33.

    I can see where you're coming from, but promotion has to be more general than just for the established hardcore bettors. What happens when you're all dead?

    Horse racing is entertainment and draws from a wide society base and the future is in the numbers.

    If you think that Arlington is better than here, then you should look at how racing in the UK is covered, now that is what I would call light years in advance.....and they to complain about it over there!!

    I certainly agree with you idea of a roaming reporter, if it's done well, it can be both entertaining and productive. I know betting is different over there, but the viewer watching something like the Cheltenham Festival gets a lot of the scoop on big best laid. Announcing bets of $250,000 to win $1.25million etc gets the viewer interested and builds excitement.

    It's all to clinical and bland and certainly needs a balance of spice and solid racing news and information.

    It needs to breed familiarity with smart, professional and entertaining trainer/jockey interviews for the general public and forthright views for the more hardcore punter.

     
  • At 8:57 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I for one enjoy the Wednesday night show on the Score. What the jockeys say in the interviews is very interesting and entertaining. I think it's actually beneficial to hear how they won a race or (in last nights case) how they lost a race. The hosts are fine, granted Renee was missed lastnight and the Sandycam is a hoot! Keep up the good work. You're right I wish they would interview after the last race, they've got plenty of time.

     
  • At 10:38 PM, Blogger the_drake said…

    This has got to be the worst argument in history. As someone who has been a big fan of racing, worked on the backside, worked for a major US racing network, owned and bred horses. I see nothing gained by cancelling the Wed. night show and putting more money towards the in house program. I could care less who the hell Bannon picks and even more so how he gets to that point and if pro handicapper up there thinks it's an integral part of the race day then maybe he could get a whisper 2000 and actually hear what they are saying in between races to help make his picks, instead of doing your homework at night and making a pick without the help of the so called experts. The Score show is great for horsepeople or fans who can't make it to the track and who are somewhat social and don't enjoy watching changes scroll by on the bottom of the screen. I have numerous friends who watch the show now after getting their first taste at the track, some of them have even invested in a horse or two because it is a sport that the common person can invest and be a part of unlike any other sport. If you want to be handicapper of the year and show up at the plant everyday and listen to speed bias B.S. then good for you I'll send you a medal. But the only way this sport will attract more fans and owners is by exposing it to the masses and making it look fun. Handicap all you want, but without owners there will be no horses to bet on, and just maybe Woodbine is trying to reach another demographic other than the misrable old man who thinks he owns the track because he's there every day. By the way this is MY opinion and right or wrong nobody said YOU were the judge of the validity of other peoples comments.

     
  • At 7:28 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I have some friends from the U.S. that come up and they can't believe that we get so much network coverage of horse racing. If this show was cancelled how long before some of you would come on and complain about the lack of t.v. coverage. In the States you get more coverage of big races on network t.v. than you do here, but in the U.S. you rarely see coverage (especially 3 hours in prime time) on a Wednesday night or 6 hours on a Sunday of regular races. The Score show is a treat and extremely entertaining. They are not trying to appeal to the old man with a cigar who use to come to the track. Cancelling it and investing more money in the simulcast show is as ridiculous as saying the Leafs are going to win the Cup next year. People who watch the simulcast show are already hard core betters and fans. And as Drake said, this is my opinion and just my opinion, but it is as valid as anyone elses.

     

Post a Comment